Pendulum Impact Hammers
How Pendulum Impact Hammers Work
Principle of Operation
The hammer energy determines the velocity of the impact tests according to ISO, ASTM and equivalent standards. Pendulum hammers can be un-instrumented or instrumented. Instrumented hammers, combined with a Data Acquisition System and Software, provide a more complete representation of an impact than an individually-calculated value.
Instrumented pendulum impact testers enable research and development and advance quality control to evaluate material failures in depth. The load on the specimen is continuously recorded as a function of time and/or specimen deflection prior to fracture. Many details, including incipient damage points and ductile-brittle transition zones, become clearly visible in the data.
Non-instrumented | Instrumented | |
Elastic modulus | ✔ | |
Yield point | ✔ | |
Energy adsorbed by the specimen | ✔ (overall energy loss) |
✔ (integration of force) |
Force at fracture | ✔ | |
Deflection at fracture | ✔ | |
Kind of fracture | ✔ | |
Temperature dependence | ✔ | ✔ |
Instron’s innovative pendulum hammer design evolved from two primary needs: accuracy and rigidity.
Instron’s patented charpy hammer structure, machined from one piece of metal alloy plates, ensures:
- Incomparable rigidity
- Solid connection to the encoder shaft
- Negligible vibrations
- Reduced energy losses due to wind friction, thanks to a flattened shape.
Equipped with an ergonomic quick-change mechanism, the hammers can be easily changed without the use of tools or screws and the wedge system assures a firm fixing. The automatic hammer recognition and in-built calibration procedure avoid any risk of error. This system consists of three pins that are positioned on the hammer and are read by the photocell system of the instrument.
When the calibration is completed (after each hammer change), the instrument has automatically performed the following operations:
1. Encoder zero-setting
2. Hammer recognition (its proper data is shown in the touch screen control panel)
3. Calculation of lost energy, shown on a green background if the value measured is lower than the maximum value allowed by the standard
All Instrumented hammers are free of wire.
The hammer is equipped with a miniaturized slip ring to transmit the electric signal with the lowest friction, avoiding spring effect of connection cables of the instrumented hammers
The set-up time and hammer connection is easy and it takes less then 5 minutes compared to 20/30 minutes for the hammers with cable connection
Any downtime due to hammer connection set up and damages to the wire are eliminated
Polymers testing according to ISO 179-1, DIN 53453, DIN 53753 and BS 2782-359
Potential un-instrumented hammer energy |
Impact velocity | ||
---|---|---|---|
J | ft/lb | m/s | ft/s |
0.5 | 0.37 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
1.0 | 0.74 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
2.0 | 1.48 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
4.0 | 2.95 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
5.0 | 3.69 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
7.5 | 5.53 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
15.0 | 11.06 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
25.0 | 18.44 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
50.0 | 36.89 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
Potential instrumented hammer energy |
Load capacity | Impact velocity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | ft/lb | kN | lbs | m/s | ft/s |
5.0 | 3.69 | 2 | 450 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
7.5 | 5.53 | 2 | 450 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
15.0 | 11.06 | 2 | 450 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
25.0 | 18.44 | 4 | 900 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
50.0 | 36.89 | 4 | 900 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
Polymers testing according to ASTM D6110
Potential un-instrumented hammer energy |
Impact velocity | ||
---|---|---|---|
J | ft/lb | m/s | ft/s |
0.5 | 0.50 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
1.0 | 0.74 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
2.7 | 2.0 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
5.4 | 4.0 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
10.8 | 8.0 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
21.6 | 16.0 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
50.0 | 36.9 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
Potential un-instrumented hammer energy |
Load capacity | Impact velocity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | ft/lb | kN | lbs | m/s | ft/s |
5.4 | 4.0 | 2 | 450 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
10.8 | 8.0 | 2 | 450 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
21.6 | 16 | 4 | 900 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
50.0 | 36.9 | 4 | 900 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
Potential un-instrumented hammer energy |
Impact velocity | ||
---|---|---|---|
J | ft/lb | m/s | ft/s |
0.5 | 0.37 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
1.0 | 0.74 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
2.75 | 2.0 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
5.5 | 4.0 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
11.0 | 8.1 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
22.0 | 16.0 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
50.0 | 36.89 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
Load capacity | Potential un-instrumented hammer energy |
Impact velocity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kN | lbs | J | ft/lb | m/s | ft/s |
2 | 450 | 5.0 | 3.69 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
2 | 450 | 11.0 | 8.1 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
2 | 450 | 22.0 | 16.0 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
2 | 450 | 50.0 | 36.89 | 3.46 | 11.35 |
Potential hammer energy |
Impact velocity |
||
---|---|---|---|
J | ft/lb | m/s | ft/s |
0.5 | 0.37 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
1.0 | 0.74 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
2.0 | 1.48 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
4.0 | 2.95 | 2.9 | 9.5 |
7.5 | 5.53 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
15.0 | 11.06 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
25.0 | 18.44 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
50.0 | 36.89 | 3.8 | 12.5 |
Potential un-instrumented hammer energy |
Striker radius | Impact velocity | Testing standards | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | ft/lb | mm | in | m/s | ft/s | |
50.0 | 36.9 | 8 | 0.314 | 3.8 | 12.5 | ISO 148 and ASTM E23 |
50.0 | 36.9 | 2 | 0.079 | 3.8 | 12.5 | ISO 148 and DIN 50115 |
Potential instrumented hammer energy |
Load capacity | Striker radius | Impact velocity | Testing standards | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | ft/lb | kN | lbs | mm | in | m/s | ft/s | |
50.0 | 36.9 | 8 | 1800 | 8 | 0.314 | 3.8 | 12.5 | ISO 148 and ASTM E23 |
50.0 | 36.9 | 8 | 1800 | 2 | 0.079 | 3.8 | 12.5 | ISO 148 and DIN 50115 |