The Challenges of Strain Control
Why Strain Control?
Some of the mechanical properties of metals are affected by the speed of the test and are therefore ‘strain-rate sensitive’. In 2009 one of the primary metals testing standards, ASTM E8, was updated to include a method based on controlling the strain rate on the specimen. Prior to this change tests could only be run in stress control or crosshead speed control, where the overall machine stiffness can affect the speed on the specimen and cause differences in results. When testing strain-sensitive materials with crosshead speed control, the allowable test speeds can cause more than a 10% difference in proof stress results from testing at the slowest and fastest rate allowed in ASTM E8/E8M and ISO 6892-1.
Running a test in strain control, however, allows the test to run at different speeds during testing in order to compensate for machine compliance and maintain a constant strain rate on the specimen. This method increases throughput by reducing the overall test time required. It can also save time and prevent specimens being wasted to tune the test, because unlike the stress control method, closed loop strain control does not require multiple trial and error adjustments to the crosshead speed to ensure that the strain rate is in compliance with the testing standards.
Requirements to Achieve Closed-Loop Strain Control
In order for a testing system to achieve closed-loop strain control, certain requirements must be met. In all cases, it is important that the test machine and extensometer be isolated from any sudden or repetitive vibrations or shocks, as this could cause interference in your testing.
An extensometer is a high-precision device used to measure deformation of a specimen. Extensometers remove system compliance from the strain measurement calculation, but it's important that the chosen extensometer is appropriate for the travel length of the specimen and has a suitable ratio of parallel length to gauge length.
Grips need to securely hold the specimen during testing, preferably with high stiffness and minimal compliance. The graph shows how different types of gripping devices can effect the system stiffness, and how a machine in strain control would need to compensate.
The load frame of the testing system needs a precise and stable drive system with high stiffness. To the right shows a stress strain curve on nominally similar materials - one testing on a high stiffness frame and the other on a low stiffness frame. Using an estimated strain method calculation, both tests are run at a constant crosshead speed of 2.25 mm/min. There was a 21% difference in 'specimen speed' (expressed in mm/min), which lead to a 5% difference in the yield result.
Machines capable of strain rate control require a responsive controller and a precise and stable drive system in order to maintain the tolerances required by the testing standard. Some machines are advertised as being able to achieve this method but require the user to manually tune the gain settings of the controller, which can be difficult for even the most experienced system operator.
A proportional specimen and a proportional gauge length extensometer are ideal. In reality, a specimen with good gauge length to parallel length ratio is well suited to minimize the strain seen outside of the gauge length, allowing the control to be more stable. If your specimens vary from discontinuous yielding to continuous yielding, it is important to change control methods for each type. As local yielding can occur outside of the gauge length on discontinuous yielding material, it is impossible to control from the strain feedback and should be in crosshead speed control during yield point elongation [YPE/Ae].
✓ More repeatable and comparable results - test results are reliable from machine to machine
✓ Improved efficiency - time per test is minimized and setup time reduced
✓ No need to tune with a specimen when using a testing system with 6800 Series controller electronics